Category: anti capitalism

Regular

image

the political spectrum even shifting an inch t…

the political spectrum even shifting an inch to the left results in these headlines.

history repeats itself: “The Truman administration, however, presented the Soviet

Union as not just a rival but an immediate threat. In a series of moves

abroad and at home, it established a climate of fear–a hysteria about

Communism–which would steeply escalate the military budget and stimulate

the economy with war-related orders. This combination of policies would

permit more aggressive actions abroad, more repressive actions at home… The left had become very influential in the hard times of the thirties,

and during the war against Fascism. The actual membership of the Communist

party was not large-fewer than 100,000 probably-but it was a potent force

in trade unions numbering millions of members, in the arts, and among countless

Americans who may have been led by the failure of the capitalist system

in the thirties to look favorably on Communism and Socialism. Thus, if

the Establishment, after World War 2, was to make capitalism more secure

in the country, and to build a consensus of support for the American Empire,

it had to weaken and isolate the left.” – Howard Zinn

Regular

image
image

You Say You Want a Revolution? The Anti-Capita…

You Say You Want a Revolution? The Anti-Capitalist Film “Sorry to Bother You” Shows the Way:

As the director and writer Boots Riley explained in a series of recent interviews, he’s not interested
in performative art or performative politics that aren’t rooted in
broader movements. “Progressives and radicals have turned more to
spectacle and gone away from actually organizing at the actual point of
contradiction in capitalism, which is the exploitation of labor, which
is also where the working class has its power,” he recently told Amy Goodman
on Democracy Now!. “We’ve gone in favor of demonstrations that don’t
necessarily have teeth … and I feel like we have to give these
demonstrations more teeth by being able to affect the bottom line.”

The diverse cast challenges the myth that class struggle must come at
the expense of nonwhite interests — an increasingly popular
characterization among liberals who’ve argued against breaking up the banks because it won’t cure racism, who’ve undermined a “new” New Deal on the basis that racial disparities marred the original, or who’ve implied,
even if unwittingly, that the recent teacher strikes in West Virginia,
Arizona, Kentucky, and Colorado were somehow at odds with the interests
of people of color. But its equally relevant for working-class white
audiences for whom a genuinely worry-free “white voice” is inaccessible,
too.

Of course, the class struggle is most urgent for those at the bottom
of the economic hierarchy, which, due to a legacy of racism, is
disproportionately nonwhite. As Terry Crews explained when asked why he took the role:

It reminded me of so many people I grew up with in Flint,
Michigan. They’d given up all of their dreams, everything they wanted
in life for the security of the factory, and it turned on them. They
told you you’re gonna have health care for life, you’re gonna have this
for life — everyone was told the same thing: This is for life, y’all.
And it went 15 years. And it was over. And everybody was like, “What do I
do now?”

Earlier in the interview, Crews summed it up precisely: “This is the movie we didn’t know we needed.”

[x]

Regular

image

Regular

Regular

image
image
image

Photo

Photo

politicalsci 2018-06-30 21:27:52

image

politicalsci 2018-06-23 15:30:19